Pete Jones (AKA trackster man) has already explained to you what to take, and what not to take with you when cycle-camping. However, as yours truly might well say "I don't do camping!", and many of you would agree with that sentiment. Whereas sleeping out under canvas (well, nylon) might be preferable to mixing it with the cockroaches in a Moroccan hotel, a full English breakfast and a warm bed wins hands down over a midge-infested wet hillside, as far as I'm concerned!
Comfort is not the only appeal of abandoning the tent, weight is also critical. While you might imagine that trackster man's burden of two 15 litre panniers and a bum bag is pretty minimal, by using roofed accommodation that can be reduced to a single 15 litre bag, a small rucsac, or even fit into a larger hydration pack.
Off road touring is a fairly specialist undertaking, and many multi-day riders resort to supported touring, where the infernal combustion engine takes the strain of the luggage. And you can't really blame them: luggage massively upsets off road ability, and it also isn't particularly compatible with suspension either. If your idea of off road is 500 miles of Tibetan 'road' then camping and panniers are a jolly good idea. If your idea of off road is 125 miles of singletrack then even those 2 small panniers and bum bag will seriously spoil your bike's handling and hence, your enjoyment. But here at Offroad Adventures - Online we don't want you followed around by a transit van nor pushing your bike along even the most minor technical sections.
The first question to consider is how long you shall be travelling for. The shorter the journey, the less you'll need to take along. For a 2 day ride you shouldn't need more than a camelback or bum-bag worth of gear (approx. 5 litres additional to day-ride kit), for 2 weeks 30 or 40 litres might be more sensible. This decision may even be iterative: a five day tour might become a three day tour by travelling lighter - therefore needing less gear.
For tours of this duration you can smell! By carrying almost nothing your enjoyment will be almost undiminished by your measly luggage. All you need to do is shower, clean your teeth and change your clothes at night. Clothes and maps are your main requirement:
If you ruthlessly cut items out of your kit for a short duration trip, your pack weight can be as low as 500g, and fit into your normal hydration pack. You will simply not notice this level of luggage, and can concentrate 100% on the riding. I proved without doubt on the South Downs way that the benefit from having almost zero luggage load, far outweighs the minor disadvantage of having minimal spare clothing at the day's end. At this end of the scale there is almost no discussion on where to carry this load, bum bag, jersey pockets, large saddle bag or hydration rucsac will all suffice.
The major problem on these tours is that the possibility of getting wet and stinking increases massively. Arriving soaked and muddy at a youth hostel with no towel or dry shoes, being caught out in a Cairngorms snow storm with inadequate clothing, or wearing the same pair of shorts for a week are all less-than-pleasant experiences. Note that a four day trip duration is not included - use your own judgement to fix together a compromise between the "take nothing" approach of the weekend tour, and the "be prepared" of the week-long epic.
Now this amount of gear can take up some serious space. 20 to 30 litres is a fair estimate. This equates to either two small panniers, or a small 'proper' rucsac. The debate into loading yourself or the bike is still not fully resolved, as the magazines might lead you to believe. As a very experienced off road tourer I can assure you that both options have their advantages. Many longer tours take place in Scotland and can occupy mile after mile of land-rover track. In this case two small panniers mounted on the rear rack might be preferable.
The rucsac allows for better bike handling, and is essential if you wish to ride a full-susser. But the flip side is the even a small rucsac can cripple you. I know more than one abandonment of a tour due to back problems caused by a rucsac. Consider the terrain and any back problem you may already suffer from, and if in doubt try both out for a day before committing. The ideal cop-out is taking a rucsac but also fitting a rear rack: if things get bad then strap the rucsac to the rack top, or even invest in a convertible pannier / rucsac. Polaris competitor might opt for a rucsac but they are only riding for a day and a half!
You might just cram all this gear into Karrimor "Rush Air", but a KIMM sac is more likely, and a superb cycling rucsac. Complete with a full camelback the weight may shock you, but the KIMM sac is designed to carry 10kg or more in mountain marathons, hence the superbly designed hip belt and harness.
For pannier users, two 15 litre (front) panniers mounted at the rear is best. Or you might cram it all into an Ortlieb waterproof stuff sack and lash it to the top of the rack. A combination of lightly loaded pannier (clothing) and a hydration pack or bumbag (water, maps, food, tools) is an ideal compromise.
However long your tour, you should really never need more than 35 litres of gear. With not much more than that capacity you could be cycle-camping! Always carry less than you think necessary, there'll still be unused items at the tour's end. Remember than if you over-pack you'll be committed to several days of uncomfortable, non-enjoyable bike pushing. If you under pack, you might get cold and wet and have to abandon early, or stink the local pub to high heavy. Strike the right balance and both days and evenings will be enjoyable rather than just bearable.
Last Updated 23-04-2001
You can contact me at James@OffroadAdventures-Online.co.uk
To return Home click here: www.OffroadAdventures-Online.co.uk
All pages and content Copyright © 1999 - 2001 James Murnaghan or their respective authors. All rights reserved.
No content of this web-site may be used in whole or in part, without the express permission of The Editor.